Editing abuse filter

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	20
Description: (publicly viewable)
Statistics:	Of the last 2 actions, this filter has matched 0 (0%). On average, its run time is 0.17 ms, and it consumes 2 conditions of the condition limit.
Conditions:	!("confirmed" in user_groups) & page_namespace == 0 & ( abuseStr := "\b((yo)?u( ?all)?\|(s?h\|w)e\|they\|it?\|y'?al+) suc?k(?!led)"; added_lines irlike abuseStr & !( (removed_lines + page_title) irlike abuseStr) ) !("confirmed" in user_groups) & page_namespace == 0 & ( abuseStr := "\b((yo)?u( ?all)?\|(s?h\|w)e\|they\|it?\|y'?al+) suc?k(?!led)"; added_lines irlike abuseStr & !( (removed_lines + page_title) irlike abuseStr) )
Notes:	Optimizing - Hersfold add tag "possible vandalism" - Cen Add condition that the "suck" string be new on th page. - Od Mishehu Removing "them"; not many vandals have bad grammar. (If you add it back, at least do the(m\|y).) - KoH Added \b, "The Suck ____" is getting caught, which are usually good edits. - KoH No \b at the end, why is it necessary to check for sucks? - KoH Optimization of the code. - Ruslik Made to work with "you suk" and "yal" and "you all"-- Tim 4/27 Considering making it a deny, as Clubot's rules are exactly those in the filter, and it reverts them. Will review a large portion of those flagged. --Tim Made so that it prevents action. Will keep a close eye on the log. -Tim Made case insensitive. Tim Setting to tag only due to false positives. -- Shirik 30 Apr 2010 Add warn, which is enough to deter 60% of vandals = fewer junk edits in article history - KoH No need for privacy. --Reaper 2012-08-21 Clean layout and reduce condition count. -DF Y'all not yall' I believe. RF 2015-02-22 Rename variable, tweak. RF 20150802 Merge 912 in to make this a generic warn and tag vandalism filter (since it is so simple). Basically counterpart of 614 for warning and tagging. -G 2019-03-06 Removed "fortnite". Too many false positives nowadays. --Reaper 2020-08-14 Exclude variant of "suck" ("suckled"), per FP. --ProcrastinatingReader 15:07 20 Mar 2021 Reversing, as negative lookahead seems to be too slow. --ProcrastinatingReader 15:10 20 Mar 2021
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	18:20, 27 May 2024 by Mausterio (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"data":{"rules":"!(\"confirmed\" in user_groups) \u0026\r\npage_namespace == 0 \u0026 ( \r\n abuseStr := \"\\b((yo)?u( ?all)?\|(s?h\|w)e\|they\|it?\|y'?al+) suc?k(?!led)\";\r\n\r\n added_lines irlike abuseStr \u0026\r\n !( (removed_lines + page_title) irlike abuseStr)\r\n)","name":"Warn and tag vandalism","comments":"Optimizing - Hersfold\r\n\r\nadd tag \"possible vandalism\" - Cen\r\n\r\nAdd condition that the \"suck\" string be new on th page. - Od Mishehu\r\n\r\nRemoving \"them\"; not many vandals have bad grammar. (If you add it back, at least do the(m\|y).) - KoH\r\n\r\nAdded \\b, \"The Suck ____\" is getting caught, which are usually good edits. - KoH\r\n\r\nNo \\b at the end, why is it necessary to check for sucks? - KoH\r\n\r\nOptimization of the code. - Ruslik\r\n\r\nMade to work with \"you suk\" and \"yal\" and \"you all\"-- Tim 4/27\r\n\r\nConsidering making it a deny, as Clubot's rules are exactly those in the filter, and it reverts them. Will review a large portion of those flagged. --Tim\r\n\r\nMade so that it prevents action. Will keep a close eye on the log. -Tim\r\n\r\nMade case insensitive. Tim\r\n\r\nSetting to tag only due to false positives. -- Shirik 30 Apr 2010\r\n\r\nAdd warn, which is enough to deter 60% of vandals = fewer junk edits in article history - KoH\r\n\r\nNo need for privacy. --Reaper 2012-08-21\r\n\r\nClean layout and reduce condition count. -DF\r\n\r\nY'all not yall' I believe. RF 2015-02-22\r\nRename variable, tweak. RF 20150802\r\n\r\nMerge 912 in to make this a generic warn and tag vandalism filter (since it is so simple). Basically counterpart of 614 for warning and tagging. -G 2019-03-06\r\n\r\nRemoved \"fortnite\". Too many false positives nowadays. --Reaper 2020-08-14\r\n\r\nExclude variant of \"suck\" (\"suckled\"), per FP. --ProcrastinatingReader 15:07 20 Mar 2021\r\n\r\nReversing, as negative lookahead seems to be too slow. --ProcrastinatingReader 15:10 20 Mar 2021","group":"default","actions":{"tag":["possible vandalism"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]},"enabled":true,"deleted":false,"hidden":false,"global":false},"actions":{"tag":["possible vandalism"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for non-registered users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

possible vandalism